JEW FINANCIERS PAUL WARBURG, BERNARD BARUCH, Eugene MEYERS, and other 'Fed' bankers INTENTIONALLY TRIGGERED the GREAT DEPRESSION... which KILLED at least THREE MILLION AMERICANS... MORE AMERICANS died from FED INSTIGATED FAMINE & related "malnutrition"& disease causes, than were Killed by HITLER's NAZI ARMIES, and Japan's genocidal imperial armies... in ALL of World War II.. put together !! (estimated 600,000 American killed in WWII)

10 Million Americans 'DISAPPEARED' during the Great Depression
While America lectures Russia on the 1932-33 famine in Ukraine, Russian

historian Boris Borisov asks what became of over seven million American citizens
who  'disappeared' from US population records in the 1930s.

1929

In April of 1929  [Rothschild's german/anglo/judeo banking agent, the very jewish]  

 Paul Warburg sends out a secret warning to his friends that a collapse and nationwide depression HAS BEEN PLANNED  for later this year. It is certainly NO COINCIDENCE that the biographies of all the Wall Street giants of that era: John D. Rockefeller; J. P. Morgan Jr.; Joseph Kennedy; Bernard Baruch; et al, all marvel at the fact these people got out of the stock-market completely, just before the crash and put their assets into cash or gold. 

So, as all the bankers and their friends already knew, in August the Federal Reserve began to tighten the money supply.Then on October 24th the big New York bankers called in their 24 hour broker call loans.This meant that both the stockbrokers and their customers had to dump their stocks on the stock-market to cover their loans, irrespective of what price they had to sell them for.
As a result of this the stock-market crashed, a day that would go down in history as, “Black Thursday.” In his book, “The Great Crash 1929,” John Kenneth Gailbraith makes the following shocking statement,

“At the height of the selling frenzy  [TRAITOR JEWISH FINANCIER]   BERNARD BARUCH  brought WINSTON CHURCHILL into the visitors gallery of the New York Stock Exchange to witness the panic and [to]impress him with his power over the wild events on the floor.”

Louis T. McFadden

Republican Congressman, Louis T. McFadden, Chairman of the House Banking & Currency Committee, from 1920 to 1931, who was a staunch critic of the Jewish bankers is quite candid as to who was responsible when he states of this crash,

“It was not accidental. It was a carefully contrived occurrence...The international bankers sought to bring about a condition of despair here so that they might emerge as rulers of us all.”

Despite the claims of how the Federal Reserve would protect the country against depressions and inflation, they continued to further contract the money supply. Between 1929 and 1933, they would reduce the money supply by an additional 33%. Even [THE VERY JEWISH!] Milton Friedman, the Nobel Peace Prize winning economist stated the following in a radio interview in January 1996,

“The Federal Reserve DEFINITELY CAUSED the GREAT DEPRESSION by CONTRACTING the amount of CURRENCY in CIRCULATION by [30%] one-third from 1929 to 1933.”

In only a few weeks from the day of the crash, 3 billion dollars of wealth vanished. Within a year, 40 billion dollars of wealth vanished. However, it did not simply disappear, it just ended up consolidated in fewer and fewer hands, AS WAS PLANNED. An example of this is Joseph P. Kennedy, John F. Kennedy's father. In 1929 he was worth 4 million dollars, in 1935 following the greatest depression in America’s history, that had increased to over 100 million dollars.

This is why depressions are caused. To take money out of the hands of the many for the benefit of a few....

RT: What
made you research the history of what you call "American
Holodomor"?



B.B: It was very simple. As I was
doing comparative research of the American Great Depression in the 1930s, and
the Great Depression of the 1990s in Russia, I grew interested in the social
dimension of the tragedy. It was logical that
I looked up official American documents and found out that the discrepancies
were so obvious that any independent researcher would not but have doubt about
the official U.S. statistic data. All appears
to be rather interesting. I will come to that later.



The U.S. Congress
added fuel to the fire by adopting resolutions nearly every year blaming the
Soviet government for alleged staged famine in the 1930s in Ukraine. The first
resolution came in 1988, 50 years after the events described. The current
members of Congress wonder about the following, and I quote, "people in the
government were aware of what was going on, but did not do anything to help the
starving".



At that very period of 1930s, the wealthy city of New York saw kilometre-long lines of people for free
soup. There were no queues on the city"s main streets though, but not because
there were no hungry people but because most of the cities did not have any
money ? they were just bankrupt.



So, I became curious about that and
carried out some research that brought about interesting results.



RT: You say
that America of the early 1930s made over seven million people perish. It"s a
horrifying figure and it needs an explanation. What do you base your research on
and why do you say the population statistics of the U.S. government of 1932-33
was falsified?



B.B.: Seven and a half million
people does not mean the number of particular victims of the famine, but a
general demographic loss, or the difference between the supposed population on
the date of the census that was due to be held in 1940 and the factual number of
people. In reality, the total demographic loss is bigger. The fact is not
contested by anyone. The figure is more than ten million people.

However, when you start researching the subject, you
find that there is a migration component ? people were coming to the country and
leaving. All can be calculated. It turns out then, that three million people can
be subtracted at the cost of migration ? in approximate figures, as it is not a
scientific report.



What"s left is 7.5 million people still missing. The
question is: ?



Voluntary defenders of U.S. values who venture to discuss
the matter with me, normally begin with a statement that those people were
simply not born. However, if we take the age pyramid and distribute the people
according to their dates of birth, it becomes apparent that 5.5 million children
and two million grown-ups are missing from the 7.5 million. So, those two
million people could not have been non-existent ? as they had been born. They
could only die.



As a result, I consider the two million of grown-up
victims as the limit proved from the bottom ? for 10 years, let me emphasise
this.



Could the remaining children out of those 5.5 not have been born?
The U.S. statistics does not answer this question. If we use the method of
international juxtapositions and see how demography reacted to similar
disastrous events in other countries, we will
see that the distribution of the demographic was divided between the
children who had died and had not been born in the ratio of ? to ?. In other
words, it"s from 2 to 4 million extra losses.



The overall loss in ten
years could be estimated as being from four - or slightly fewer - to six - or
slightly more - million.



Let me quote some figures, if you don"t mind ?
demonstrating how other countries reacted to the similar situation. If you
believe that four or six million people is a terrible number, let me quote this:
male mortality rate in Russia: 810,000 in 1984; 1,226,000 in 1994 - whereas the
population is the same. In other words, as compared with 1984, the year 1996 had
an additional number of 416,000 dead males. You have to add females and children
to that figure.

As of now the prevalence of the death rate over
birth rate yet remains, although smaller. Some say it is horrible, others say
it"s normal as the country is developing. So there are different takes about
there being half a million dead. Nobody tears his or her hair out to discuss
this.



Likewise, there were opposing viewpoints in the USA. Some said it
was horrible ? "We had millions of people deprived of their land!" ? those who
read Steinbeck well knew the situation from his documentary-authentic novels
depicting starving children. Others say, "No, it"s all right. We"re fighting depression and all is as scheduled." Like
here today, I think.



RT: Imagine the so-called "hungry marches" in the times of
President Hoover and quote memories of a child about those events. Did you
actually find any survivors still alive to tell the story and confirm the fact
of "American Holodomor"?



B.B.: Let me draw your
attention to the fact that it was not me who called those marches "hunger
marches". They were called so by the participants. When someone goes marching in
protest against war, they protest against war because people get killed there.
When someone protests against hunger, it means they protest against dying of
starvation, and the people are ready for social unrest. You may know that not
only the police but also regular military
troops were used to disperse those marches.



There is a huge amount of
evidence. Let me quote some. For example. The thing is that in summer an article
by Dmitriy Lyskov was published in the English
translation, with some conclusions drawn from my research. That caused
active discussion in English-language blogs, also in the USA, which is
understandable.



What do Americans write in their stories? Just three
quotes:



1) The ancient members of my family told me how people used to
come to the door asking to do a day"s work
for only a meal.



2) If this story is true and our federal
government knew the enormity of the crisis during the 30s, then it might explain
their silence about the famine in Ukraine during the same time.



3) It's a
good argument. I heard lots of stories about the Depression from all my relatives, and especially from my mother and
father. People were starving, I don"t dispute that. But I don"t think it would
have been seven million.



We can see flat ideological statements about
democracy and freedom in the USA then, therefore such things just could not have
been there. However, we have authentic stories, so numerous that one could make
volumes out of them and put them on a shelf.



RT: Such
outstanding historical moments are usually reflected in literature, films, and,
of course, journalist reports and research
articles. The American depression is definitely one of those remarkable
periods. Is there any proof of your theory in an article of a newspaper of that
time?



B.B.: They did write about it, of course,
but in a style similar to that used in our newspapers about the 1990s. They
criticised the government, parties fought each other, someone criticised local
authorities, someone insisted on their programmes, others on the opposite. As a
whole, however, the bigger picture of the epoch will be seen only in a while. As
for sources, they can be used for reference about those real events that were
happening there.



Of course, journalists may be interested in a fact about
a tractor that pulled down a farm. There are many facts of this kind ? Steinbeck
eloquently tells a lot about such things. But as to what happened to that farm
later, the fact being that ten people left but only eight came back, is seldom
told ? both then and now. It"s not something of big interest to journalists.



For instance, who died in
your family in the past two years?



You must bear in mind that those who
died are in the lowest stratum of the American society ? either had been poor,
or became poor and failed to get out of this level. Try to find research details
about the death rate among homeless people in Russia now ? you will encounter
big difficulties. You may find, but that may take a long time. And you will
hardly find anything in newspapers, despite the fact that mortality among the
homeless is there. And it"s about citizens of Russia and most likely the number
of those dying is big. Perhaps the factor that not all of them volunteered to
become homeless is the answer.



RT: In your article, you write about the
agrarian business lobby you claim is guilty of destroying the state food
resources. Can you please tell more about it and maybe compare it to any
instance of more recent economic wars or lobbies,
maybe?



B.B.: The modern example is obvious ? it"s
a modern programme of producing fuel from food. It"s not by chance, that the
Cuban leader Fidel Castro raised this question, thus dotting the "i"s" and
crossing the "t"s". As a matter of fact, producing fuel from food is something
to enrich someone, whereas impoverishing dozens of millions of others. The
process is already there and the current increase of food prices is already
causing political unrest and more deaths. Medical specialists don't do this in
third-world countries nor in rich countries so far. The process is under way.
Unless stopped, by the end of the 21st century, the programme of obtaining fuel
from food will be studied in history books on pages next to Hitler and
concentration camps. The scale of the consequences would be comparable, in terms
of the number of victims.



This is what concerns the current
situation.



RT: We had these discussions in the time of chaos and
depression in the world"s financial markets. Hundreds of people are losing their
jobs, credits are not paid back, the mortgage crisis is on. As an economist, do
you see this as the beginning of a new great depression and, actually, a new
Holodomor?



B.B.: Comparing the current crisis
with the Great Depression has become commonplace in economic discussions. I
would rather not over-load you with some economic terms but let me give you a
simple example. The modern crisis radically differs from the one in the early
20th century. Whereas that crisis was of an industrial society, this one is of a
post-industrial society and the economy of services.



What does that mean?
Imagine yourself a highly-paid specialist in securities. You strike deals and
earn a lot. You"re sure you"re worth it, because the deals yield good profits.
Who do you need? A legal adviser. Many of them, with an office, secretaries,
clerks ? all of whom help you not to lose your money and do your business. Who
do the legal advisers need? They need bank employees who take their lucrative
salaries and deposit them at advantageous terms. This is what makes up the first
financial circle.



The first circle is followed by another one, where
people need property dealers, as they are very busy themselves and would not
build homes on their own. They would need a tourist agent to quickly arrange
that their bottoms could be warmed up in Hawaii. And they need transfer agents
to arrange all the transportation.



Then follows the third circle of the
services industry ? including cafes where the guys from the first and second
circles have coffee, restaurant where they dine, fitness centres to make them
fit sometimes ? an they're necessary in the centre of the city, because they
cannot afford getting away from the money source spring as someone else can
crawl up and scoop from it. Ninety per cent of the fee is taken by the rent of
the premises in the prestigious locations.



All the rest is arranged
likewise.



Now, imagine that the stock market has collapsed. You have no
job and no revenue. So you pack to leave ? Lehman Brothers all pack. You don"t
need legal advisers anymore. If you do, however, you have no money to pay them
with. No bank specialists are required. That is followed by no need for a
property agent, and all the rest down the chain.



What have we got as a
result? In an industrial economy, an enterprise has some safety factor ? some
reserves, long-term contracts, some property they can sell or mortgage at the
end of the day. There is no such safety margin in the services industry. As soon
as the money source stops, the services industry rumbles like a house of
cards.



So, things may be developing now much faster than in the pre-WWII
times. This is what we can see happening now during a very short period of time,
much shorter than in the time of the Great Depression, major financial
institutions collapsed, which set the alarm bells ringing, as French President
Sarkozy put it, making the economy a little smarter. This is well understood by
the leaders, but nobody says how to do this.