JEWISH LYNCH-MOB sulzberger New York Slimes - PIMPS WAR using HITLER, NAZI DICTATORSHIP powers - "Even if it is illegal" !!

  Bomb Syria, Even if It Is Illegal 

 By IAN HURD, prof. at NWU,  Op-Ed Contributor for  the sulzberger lying NEW YORK TIMES
  August 27, 2013
www.nytimes.com/2013/08/28/opinion/bomb-syria-even-if-it-is-illegal.html

EVANSTON, Ill. — THE latest atrocities in the Syrian civil war, which has killed more than 100,000 people**
 **[BECAUSE the FOUL JEWS in israel and INFESTED in the U.S. government & press/media  have UNLEASHED A PLAGUE - using billions of dollars STOLEN from the U.S. economy in the name of  'national security'  and using their SAUDI, QATARI, BAHRAINI, KUWAITI, and other SUNNI  THEOCRATIC DICTATOR  DESPOT ALLIES  to fund  a  Sunni al QAEDA  JIHADI, genocidal, mass-murderous TERRORIST proxy INVASION of   Syria]  
 demand an urgent response to deter further massacres and to punish President Bashar al-Assad. 
     [ WHY  was JEW WAR-STATE Prime Minister 'king bibi' NETANYAHU  NOT "PUNISHED" for   USING  'white phosphorous'  and massive bombs  on the  encircled and besieged CIVILIAN POPULATION of GAZA in Jan. 2009??  is  Mr. Ian Hurd a RACIST who APPROVES of the MASS-MURDER & TERROR by BOMBING of PALESTINIAN civilians??]  

But there is widespread confusion over the legal basis for the use of force in these terrible circumstances. As a legal matter, the Syrian government’s use of chemical weapons does not automatically justify armed intervention by the United States. 

There are moral reasons for disregarding the law,
  [ THE JEWS are NOW ADVOCATING  NAZI, HITLERIAN DICTATOR WAR POWERS,  for the simple reason that they are  insane MASS-MURDEROUS  HYPOCRITES who _WANT_  to start a NEW WAR - with AMERICANS once again footing the bill in blood & treasure...]
 and I believe the Obama administration should intervene in Syria.  But [I]  should not pretend that there is a legal justification in existing law.Secretary of State John Kerry seemed to do just that on Monday, when he said of the use of chemical weapons, “This international norm cannot be violated without consequences.” His use of the word “norm,” instead of “law,” is telling.

Syria is a party to neither the Biological Weapons Convention of 1972 nor the Chemical Weapons Convention of 1993, and even if it were, the treaties rely on the United Nations Security Council to enforce them — a major flaw.
  [A "MAJOR FLAW" in the United States Constitution, and U.N. charter, is that both the United States and United Nations have been BRIBED, BOUGHT-OUT, COERCED, EXTORTED and reduced to VASSAL SLAVES, by the  "HOSTILE TAKEOVER" or "LEVERAGED BUY-OUT of the insane judeo war-lobby, which is one and the same with the  judeo "MONEY POWER"  which through BRIBERY and DECEIT had taken over every Western nation's  MONEY-PRINTING powers]
Syria is a party to the Geneva Protocol, a 1925 treaty that bans the use of toxic gases in wars. But this treaty was designed after World War I with international war in mind, not internal conflicts....

There is no doubt that Mr. Assad’s government has violated humanitarian principles throughout the two-year-old war, including the prohibition on the indiscriminate killing of civilians, even in non-international conflicts, set out in 1949 in the Geneva Conventions.
 [MORE CROCODILE TEARS from the  GENOCIDAL,  MASS-MURDEROUS jews and their  "hirelings" PARTNERS IN CRIMES,  ATROCITIES,  GLOBAL ECONOMIC DESTRUCTION and  METASTASIZING GLOBAL WARS of  nothing but  SERIAL ATROCITIES and SERIAL CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY,  pimped by  media & academic  WHORES such as Mr. Hurd]

But the conventions also don’t mean much unless the Security Council agrees to act. It is an indictment of the current state of international law that there is no universally recognized basis to intervene.
   [There  IS  a "universally recognized basis to intervene" - when the GOD DAMNED   GENOCIDAL JEWS  _WANT_  A NEW WAR!] 

Arguably, the key legal obligation of nations in the post-1945 world is adherence to theUnited Nations Charter.  It demands that states refrain “from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state.” The use of force is permitted when authorized by the Security Council or for self-defense (and countries like Jordan and Turkey are considering this route to justify joining an anti-Assad coalition) — but not purely on humanitarian grounds.
  [TURKEY is USING POISON GAS, TORTURE, and MASS-MURDER on its KURDISH MINORITIES AS WE SPEAK... and BAHRAIN is KILLING  SHIITE PROTESTERS on a serial basis,  you genocidal  war-pig hypocrite] 

Of course ethics, not only laws, should guide policy decisions. Since the Rwandan genocide and the Balkan mass killings of the 1990s, a movement has emerged in support of adding humanitarian intervention as a third category of lawful war, under the concept of the “responsibility to protect.” It is widely accepted by the United Nations and most governments. It is not, however, in the charter, and it lacks the force of law.
  [You can be ARRESTED for  the 'crime'  of  simply  FILMING POLICE on a PUBLIC SIDEWALK here in the late 'United' States of Amerika - WITH THE APPROVAL of the TREASONOUS  jewish WAR PIG  editors and publishers of the Sulzberger New York Slimes -  so America no longer has ANY  basis to  be pimping itself as "HUMANITARIAN" any longer.]  

This was evident in Kosovo in 1999, when NATO bombed Yugoslavia without United Nations authorization.
 [The United States DESTROYED CIVILIAN INFRASTRUCTURE in Serbia with a MASSIVE, ILLEGAL BOMBARDMENT that  in addition to DESTROYING life-supporting water, power, and sewage treatment plants - as in Iraq just 4 years later - but also   LEFT a DEADLY WAKE OF   "DEPLETED URANIUM"  ETERNALLY TOXIC, RADIOACTIVE, CHEMICAL WEAPONS DUST,  you HYPOCRITE, LYING "humanitirian" WAR PIG!  YOU DESERVE to SEE YOUR CHILDREN have to drink DU CONTAMINATED WATER, you mass-murderous HYPOCRITE!]

Then, as now, Russia and China were unwilling to grant Security Council approval. America and its allies went ahead with what the Independent International Commission on Kosovo later called an “illegal but legitimate” use of force. In that case, NATO accepted implicitly that its act was illegal. It defended it in moral and political language rather than legal terms. 
   [YOU ARE ABSOLUTELY CORRECT,  we can all be sure that BILL COHEN, the SECRETARY OF WAR under  president CLINTON who both AUTHORIZED those "ILLEGAL" BOMBINGS, are  delighted to read your regarding their "humanitarian" BOMBINGS as  admission that the U.S. government was PERPETRATOR of  WAR CRIMES.]

Norms and institutions of international criminal law, including 11 years of experience with the International Criminal Court, have strengthened since then.
["Norms and institutions of international criminal law...  have strengthened since then"???   The CRIMINAL, TREASONOUS  Barack Obama/ Joe BIDEN,  JOHN KERRY / Hillary Clinton  administration is INSTIGATING and DIRECTING  AL QAEDA jihadi TERRORISTS to INVADE SYRIA, you mass-murderous HYPOCRITE LIAR!] 

 Special tribunals for Cambodia, Rwanda and the former Yugoslavia reflect a growing consensus that perpetrators of atrocities should be punished
 [and indeed the UNITED STATES SHOULD BE INDICTED and TRIED for WAR CRIMES in IRAQ, AFGHANISTAN,  directing the JIHADI INVASION of LIBYA, and now SYRIA]

But if the White House takes international law seriously — as the State Department does —
[the 'United' States STATE DEPARTMENT is a COLLECTION OF JEWISH  WAR-MONGERING TRAITORS!] 

Since Russia and China won’t help, Mr. Obama and allied leaders should declare that international law has evolved  [DEVOLVED to  NUCLEAR-ARMED  HITLERIAN AGRESSION against formerly peaceful small nations that are BESIEGED by USA, Saudi, Turk, British, French, and NATO   INSTIGATED and SUPPLIED FOREIGN TERRORISTS proxy armies]
and that they don’t need Security Council approval to intervene in Syria.